Saturday, November 26, 2011

Three Important Poets

Well, at least for me.

My love for poetry was almost an afterthought. Poetry for me back then was lines and lines of incomprehensible sentences strung together, and to make them look and sound pretty, they have rhyming words at each line. A fine example is this:

And chiefly Thou O Spirit, that dost prefer 
Before all Temples th' upright heart and pure, 
Instruct me, for Thou know'st; Thou from the first 
Wast present, and with mighty wings outspread 
Dove-like satst brooding on the vast Abyss 
And mad'st it pregnant: What in me is dark 
Illumine, what is low raise and support; 
That to the highth of this great Argument 
I may assert th' Eternal Providence, 
And justifie the wayes of God to men.

Some may find this familiar, but if you don't, it's a part of Milton's great opus, Paradise Lost. Words that I, from henceforward , have never heard, seen and/or wrote before are jumbled and pushed together with familiar words that sometimes I wondered back then whether my English teacher was teaching me a different language altogether. Wast? Satst? Illumin? What in the world are these words? Thou know'st? This effectively killed my interest for poem - until I read this in a local newspaper.


I WANDER'D lonely as a cloud
That floats on high o'er vales and hills,
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden daffodils;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.


Continuous as the stars that shine
And twinkle on the Milky Way,
They stretch'd in never-ending line
Along the margin of a bay:
Ten thousand saw I at a glance,
Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.


The waves beside them danced; but they
Out-did the sparkling waves in glee:
A poet could not but be gay,
In such a jocund company:
I gazed -- and gazed -- but little thought
What wealth the show to me had brought:


For oft, when on my couch I lie
In vacant or in pensive mood,
They flash upon that inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude;
And then my heart with pleasure fills,
And dances with the daffodils.



It was my first proper introduction to poetry.

In Wordsworth's poem I found that words can be musical if read properly and correctly. Imagine, a fifteen-year-old, recognising this for the first time! The words actually rhyme so wonderfully it made me sit still for a long time, reading and re-reading the page, tasting the delicious rhyme in my mouth like some flavour newly sampled. I carried this poem for a long time, basing most of my own meager poems on this structure. Also, later I found out that in poetry, the usually rigid laws of sentence construction can be happily bent out of shape, or even broken (GASP) in order to fit your subject matter. 

But this fellow is not in my top three. It took another encounter with similar structure that I finally know who is my main poet. This is the other encounter, and no, he is not my top three either. But he's no slouch in the poem department:


He walked amongst the Trial Men
  In a suit of shabby grey;
A cricket cap was on his head,
  And his step seemed light and gay;
But I never saw a man who looked
  So wistfully at the day.


I never saw a man who looked
  With such a wistful eye
Upon that little tent of blue
  Which prisoners call the sky,
And at every drifting cloud that went
  With sails of silver by.


The first time I read this I was appalled, then sympathised, then finally, happily nodded. My only input of Oscar Wilde was his horror psychological story, 'The Picture of Dorian Gray' which actually led me to this poem of 'The Ballad of the Reading Gaol'. Since it was a narrative poem, it was several pages long. But I endured it to the end, and came away happy. Now I realised that poem can be a story, too, the sky's the limit!

Okay. We'll start from the bottom. Here's my third poet.

3. Edgar Allan Poe
Poem Hook: The Raven
Favourite: Annabel Lee

Yeah, it's the 18th century gothic emo-writer that got me really into poetry. After reading the inescapable 'The Black Cat' and 'The Tell-Tale Heart' I was immediately hooked. What else could this scary writer with a mind that can turn a seemingly harmless black cat into a nightmare? I found 'The Raven'. 


Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
`Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,' I said, `art sure no craven.
Ghastly grim and ancient raven wandering from the nightly shore -
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night's Plutonian shore!'
Quoth the raven, `Nevermore.'


What stroke of genius made Poe put voice into a wandering raven nobody will probably be able to decipher, but I am thankful for it. The poem is a practice in a matter Poe is very familiar with: redundancy made nightmarish. As a poem lover, this is arguably a must-know poem. But my love is with Annabel Lee.



The angels, not half so happy in heaven,
   Went envying her and me-
Yes!- that was the reason (as all men know,
   In this kingdom by the sea)
That the wind came out of the cloud by night,
Chilling and killing my Annabel Lee.


But our love it was stronger by far than the love
   Of those who were older than we-
Of many far wiser than we-
   And neither the angels in heaven above,
Nor the demons down under the sea,
Can ever dissever my soul from the soul
Of the beautiful Annabel Lee.



Yes, it's there again: redundancy. Poe's redundancy, however irritating it may seem, might be the important nail that holds everything together. Imagine if the Raven could say other things, or that Annabel Lee and kingdom by the sea is replaced by something else. It just doesn't feel right. Analysis aside, this poem is touching, and almost frightening, in its alacrity and obsessiveness.

2. Dante Alighieri
Poem Hook: The Divine Comedy*
Favourite: Inferno



    Midway upon the journey of our life, 
I found myself within a forest dark,
For the straightforward pathway had been lost.    
    Ah me! how hard a thing it is to say
What was this forest savage, rough, and stern,
Which in the very thought renews the fear.
    So bitter is it, death is little more;
But of the good to treat, which there I found,
Speak will I of the other things I saw there.


And so begins one of mankind's great literature prizes. Okay, so Dante wrote more poems than this, but this is borne out of my other great love: classical music. Tchaikovsky wrote an overture for Francesca da Rimini, and needless to say, it piqued my interest to explore this poem. I was immediately interested when Dante began describing hell and its tenants, no details spared. Yeah, so I am yet to read the whole poem in Italian, but there are so many translations out there that also merit a time to read.

*This is the version translated by Longfellow.


1. Emily Dickinson
Poem Hook: Because I Could Not Stop For Death
Favourite: The Heart asks Pleasure First


The little woman of poetry did not publish much of her only-now critically lauded poems when she was alive. She kept much of her unpublished gems in little papers and it did not help that her handwriting was hard to decipher. Her frequent use of dashes and (back then) unconventional rhyming would have been enough for the literary circle to crucify her. However today her poems are the rage.


There's a certain Slant of light,
Winter Afternoons – 
That oppresses, like the Heft
Of Cathedral Tunes – 


Heavenly Hurt, it gives us – 
We can find no scar,
But internal difference,
Where the Meanings, are – 


None may teach it – Any – 
'Tis the Seal Despair – 
An imperial affliction
Sent us of the air – 


When it comes, the Landscape listens – 
Shadows – hold their breath – 
When it goes, 'tis like the Distance
On the look of Death – 


Even today it is hard to actually understand why the frequent use of dashes, as seen here. A little mystery goes a long way in getting people interested. But I am not interested in mysteries. I am very partial to her other poem, which is what I will leave you, gentle readers, with:


The heart asks pleasure first,
And then, excuse from pain;
And then, those little anodynes
That deaden suffering;


And then, to go to sleep;
And then, if it should be
The will of its Inquisitor,
The liberty to die.


Monday, July 18, 2011

Three Chinese Poets

       Spring View / Spring Prospect AKA Spring in Time of War - Du Fu


   the country lay broken, but nature still persists
   a city in springtime where grass and trees may flourish
   the sight of springflowers leaves me in tears;
   disheartened by isolation, passing birds startle me
   while a beacon continues burning for months of three. 
   A letter from home is worth ten thousand taels
   and, as I scratch my head I realise now;
   my hair is fewer and white; it simply 
   cannot hold my hairpin any more.
- this is my own translation from the thousands of literal translation found on the Internet.


   The bloom is not a bloom,
   The mist not mist.
   At midnight she comes,
   And goes again at dawn.
   She comes like a spring dream - how long will she stay?
   She goes like morning cloud, without a trace.



   Under Heaven no place hurts the heart the most
   than Lao Lao Pavilion, for bidding visitors adieu.
   The spring wind tastes the bitterness of parting
   and the willow twig shall never be green again*.

- *again, this is my own translation. Part of formal leave-taking was 
to snap a willow twig in two, which explains the next poem.




   From whose house does the secret jade flute sound
   that become lost in the spring air which fills Luoyang?
   Amidst the nocturne I recall the snapped willow* -
   What man may not feel homesick!

Well, that's it for now. These Chinese poets are amazing and refreshing, really. Use those links to get to the actual poems.

Monday, May 16, 2011

Thursday, March 03, 2011

Sickening, Shocking and Sad

I have grown quite jaded with technology these days, I avoid using all the social networks. I rarely stay online longer than three hours a day because I simply have no time for it. When my colleagues ask for my facebook account, I would stall them as long as possible, because the human element is missing, for me at least.

But today I saw a different kind of resurgence in technology. It lends a more human, albeit a little disconcerting, tone to what I have come to consider a purely virtual experience.

It began with a little video. It was mercifully void of sound, of reasons which I shall elaborate later. A person stands on a pavement of an unknown location. It could be an entry into an apartment, because on the left side was a row of postboxes. She (it turns out to be a tomboy) waves her umbrella to a small kitten, maybe only a few weeks old.

The kitten shrinks away, for the said umbrella is waved not in the gentle manner one would when one plays with a kitten in order for it to catch it, but haphazardly. Then she waves her umbrella again,  not at the first kitten, but at an unseen second kitten, hidden by the wall. This kitten tries to stand up as the woman walks away, only to turn around at the helpless animal.

The first kitten limps away. A pause follows, only to be broken by another wave of the umbrella. This time, however, it hits the target: the second kitten. The tip catches the kitten and drags it across the pavement, twirling it in the process. At this moment the kitten must have squealed loudly because the mother comes running towards them. She tries to pick up her injured kitten, but the woman waves again the dreaded umbrella, making the mother second-guesses herself, and moves away.

At this moment, the kitten is still moving, if barely. It tries to rise to its feet. The mother cat runs again towards her kitten, only to be threatened by the woman, who then cruelly pushes the kitten closer towards the camera. Then she tries to hit the kitten, but mercifully misses.

Here the woman did something I would never have dreamt of committing, unless I am in danger: she kicks the kitten. I wonder, why in the world would one kick at a kitten that is smaller than the sole of your foot?

The mother cat must have attempted to retrieve her beleaguered young a few times, because the woman keeps on swinging the umbrella up and down threateningly, and missing the kitten. At one point, the kitten crawls away, unseen by the camera, and the whole drama would have stopped. I wished it would have stopped by then, too.

She stops, too, the woman with men's baggy shorts and t-shirt and an umbrella, and turns slightly away, moving to the wall where the kittens had been. Does she walk away?

She does not. She swings her umbrella again, and this time it lands on something. Hidden by the wall, there was another kitten. She hits it again, and this time the mother cat doesn't wait for another mewl to realise that danger is near: she runs toward the woman, who avoids, then hits the bolting mother cat. The mother cat cannot do anything else but watch what unfolds next.

As if Providence itself had placed the camera, anything and everything that the woman does next was mercifully hidden. The pavement is slightly raised off the small lane, and behind a low table is presumably a drain. What she does here on stops my blood cold. 

She begins beating the kitten. There is no sound (the reason why I am thankful) but it is evident from the video that the beatings must have been very severe; at one point the kitten's legs are seen pointing to the air - so hard were the hits administered.

The kitten tries to fight back now and then, but its end is foreseeable. Stopping only now and then to see if people were around, she would resume her beating of this kitten, who by the three-quarter length of the video must have been very nearly dead. 

After repetitious beating, she seems to leave the scene for good. At this point my blood, which has run cold, is boiling. If I were near, or if I was on guard at this moment, I would have drove this woman away. I probably would have done the same thing she did to these cats. All manners of punishments comes to mind. Sadly, I am now an onlooker.

To my surprise, the woman - the perpetrator - the murderess - returns to the scene of the crime. The umbrella is missing. She rubs her hands, crouches and picks up the kitten. There is no sign of life by now. Not a tail moves, no legs twitching, no life. The kitten is clearly dead. 

When she picks up the kitten, I thought dear me, she's going to hide the evidence. But no, dear readers. She does every single criminal who has ever committed crimes: act out the level of her intelligence, which, as I reviewed the video, is single to nothing. 

She brings the dead kitten into the small hallway, looks up at the camera - thus revealing her face - plops it down like a piece of trash, and stomps on it. Twice for a good measure. Then she turns away. By that moment, she must have seen a person walks by while she stomps on the lifeless kitten, but she is barely perturbed.

When she walks away, I again thought this must be the end, and steals a wary glance at the time. There are about fifteen seconds left, and I dread these seconds. I dread myself for being correct. And I was. She returns, rubs her nose, kicks the dead kitten away, out of the camera's angle, and finally walks away. 

The first time I viewed the video, I did not cry. Yes, I felt sorry - deeply sorry - for the kittens, for the mother cat, but I was more angry than sad. A human being, the pinnacle of evolution, the creature God made angels bow down to, has committed such insidious acts of cruelty. Is she trying to prove something by killing kittens? Is she simply trying to incite hatred against herself? Then again, she is not my concern. I feel deeply for the cats more than this woman's motives or her mental well-being.

This video has been spread in facebook.com, by bloggers, and a Chinese daily did an article on it. In facebook.com, soon after this video surfaced, a facebook member reported it, who then quickly deleted her account. But it was too late: someone else found pictures of the woman online, and has since placed them online. As it is now, many online users have ganged up in search for what they angrily labelled as 'Cat Killer'.

Online opinion is divided upon this video. While most are leaning towards the capture of the woman, not a few voiced their astonishment; why would a video of a woman killing a helpless kitten should provoke anger enough to trigger a manhunt all over Serdang? Aren't there more things to do than looking for this woman? Like, maybe, help the Libyans? For that question, I provide only one answer: in order to change the world, change the small things first. Like what my Muslim friends always say, 'nawaitu' matters a great deal.

There is nothing more precious than life, be it human, animals or any other forms of sentient beings. According to the Bible, when Cain murdered his sibling Abel, the latter's blood cried out from the ground to God. Surely, when the woman kills this kitten without mercy, for purposes none other than to excite herself, I imagine that animal's blood would cry out unto God, seeking justice as well. Then lo and behold, a CCTV video appeared online, of all places.

I would imagine an atheist would have to agree on this logic as well: To erase an existence is a morally wrong decision.
           
I wish not to share this horrible video, but as Curiosity is an insatiable monster, here is the link. It is a facebook link, so prepare yourself suitably.